Archive photo (Image credit: AP)

The Washington PostThe decision not to support a candidate 2024 presidential election has sparked criticism and resignations, even as the Post's leadership tries to justify it.
According to The New York Post, the Post's 36-year tradition of supporting presidential candidates was reportedly cut short by billionaire Jeff Bezos.
Editorial staff had reportedly written a recommendation for Democratic candidate Kamala Harris over former President Donald Trump
The decision appears to have caused divisions within the postal service. veteran Editorial team Member Robert Kagana vocal Trump critic, resigned in protest. Former editor Marty Baron condemned the move as “cowardice of which democracy is a victim” and argued it undermines the Post’s role in holding political leaders accountable.
Critics, including some employees, questioned Bezos' motives and pointed to his extensive business interests. They speculate that his decision may be due to Trump's previous criticism of Bezos and Amazon because of the company's reliance on government contracts.
Editor Will Lewis announced that The Washington Post would “return to its roots” by foregoing support in this and future elections. In a note to readers, Lewis acknowledged that some might see this as a “tacit endorsement or condemnation” of one candidate over another. But he argued that the decision reflected a commitment to “integrity and courage in public service.”
Bezos, who is worth an estimated $209 billion, has not commented publicly, fueling further speculation. Former Washington Post editor Karen Attiah expressed frustration, calling the decision “a slap in the back to all of us who value democracy.”
Scores of subscribers took to social media, with some canceling their subscriptions and accusing Bezos of putting his business goals ahead of public service. Many commentators saw this as a betrayal of the Post's readers, who have long relied on the newspaper for political support.
This trend is not unique to The Post, as The Los Angeles Times also recently announced a similar policy, reportedly led by owner Patrick Soon-Shiong.
The policy has led to resignations and raised concerns about the growing influence of the rich Media owner about editorial decisions. Critics argue that these decisions represent a troubling shift in the way news organizations approach democratic processes, particularly in times of division.